Use of Illustration
by Brad Holland, Glenda Rogers Stocco, Tamara Shannon, Allen Comport
Illustration offers visual solutions to design challenges. Illustration
is able to transcend the limits of the written word. It is an art of opposites, an intricate
dance between art and commerce that is created by people who find freedom in solving visual
riddles and in filling dictated space with inventiveness, creativity and added value. Each
illustrator brings a different perspective, vision and idea to play that, when married with
great design, becomes an original art form. Illustration brings spontaneity, freshness and
a unique point of view to the design of content. It helps to communicate both simple and
complex messages while enhancing a design through the unique vision and skill of the selected
illustrator. When a designer selects an illustrator to use, he or she is not only receiving
the rights to reproduce the finished piece, but is also receiving the fruits of years of
exploration and the development of an individual style. This individual style becomes the
core of the product, the individual service offered and the asset that embodies the completed
creative work. This intellectual and creative property is no different from other proprietary
business products and services. It is developedand protectedto enhance the value of the finished user.
Select an illustrator based on previous work. There are countless ways to locate the perfect
illustrator for a particular project. Many buyers turn to annuals, sourcebooks and the
Internet, along with local illustration clubs, organizations and personal recommendations.
Typically, a buyer will either request a portfolio or review the work online. It is not
appropriate to ask for original sketches for an assignment without compensating the illustrator
(asking for "spec" or speculative work). The selection should be based on seeing previous work
and discussing the assignment with the illustrator. There are also archives available of pre-existing
illustration commonly referred to as "stock" and "royalty-free" illustration. In many instances,
it may not be possible to commission a unique illustration, so a designer may decide to license
this existing art to illustrate a project. It's a safe assumption to state that a client is best
protectedin terms of the quality of the work and assurances on the limited availability of the
workwhen illustrations are licensed directly from the illustrator or his or her authorized
representative. The alternative is to license the work through a stock agency.
Within the illustration community, the most reputable stock agencies are considered those whose
pricing and usage are handled by the creator, whose fees are fair and reasonable to creators and
who recognizes the creator with credit lines for the illustration. There is some concern over
agencies that fail to protect the client from acquiring an illustration without a clear measure
of how broadly the image is already being used, from acquiring an image for which the rights are
not available and from acquiring illustrations that misappropriate an original artists style. In
other words, it is important for the client to work with intermediaries who demonstrate the same
respect for the integrity of illustration as intellectual property as the client would expect in
the treatment of its own assets. This protects the value of both the illustrator's and the client's
finished property. Although convenient, stock does not always serve the creative process. Many believe
it is an alternative best utilized when there are no other options.
Price is directly related to use. There are many considerations for pricing a piece
of illustration. One common misperception is that fees are based on whether it is original or stock art.
The fee for the use of illustration should be based on the use of an illustration and the exclusivity
of its use, not on whether it is original or stock. The fee will vary based on how exclusive the use
of the image is in the use that is contemplated for it, and whether the client wants rights for all
uses for a set period of time (which is a licensing equivalent to purchasing the illustration). Specification
of the anticipated use must be clearly stated in a written agreement. A troubling ambiguity often exists,
however, about whether an image licensed for use in a print medium is then included in the Internet
version of the print piece. Unless the use was specified, the rights are not automatically granted.
As in any agreement, it is important to clearly state all usage for purchase in detail; otherwise the
rights not specifically purchased remain the property of the illustrator.
Every agreement should exist in writing. Once the appropriate talent has been selected,
negotiations begin taking into account the following criteria: rights, usage, schedule, exclusivity,
complexity, extended rights and, in some cases, the reputation of the talent selected. Written and signed
documentation should be completed before work is begun (even on a rush project) to ensure that everyone
has the same understanding. This document should outline in detail the usage, deadlines, level of corrections
allowed before incurring additional charges, potential kill fees, payment details, form of delivery for
final art, expenses, etc. Typically there is one sketch submitted unless otherwise negotiated. If the project
requires more than this standard, then this must be communicated and negotiated beforehand. Often "corrections"
or small adjustments are made, but only to the original agreed upon concept. These guidelines stand for
computer-generated illustrations as well. Although the work is created in a different manner, the same
considerations are adhered to. "Changes" reflect new ideas that are brought into the sketch or finish stages.
These are negotiated before the changes begin and are added as an addendum to the contract. Original artwork
belongs to the illustrator. There are concerns that the buyer and illustrator must keep in mind to protect the
value of the work, both within and outside the context of the contracted usage. These issues are understood
within the industry and are adhered to by professionals on both ends of the creative exchange. An artist's
copyright is owned by the artist and is protected from the moment it is created by the 1976 Copyright Act. This
protection covers the work for the artist's lifetime plus 70 years. If agreed to in writing, the copyright may
be assigned elsewhere. Original artwork belongs to the illustrator, regardless of the use rights that are licensed.
Original artwork is provided temporarily to licensees for reproduction. Even the purchase of "exclusive rights"
represents rights to reproduce the artwork only. The original illustration remains the property of the illustrator
unless it is purchased explicitly and separately from the rights. Original artwork cannot be changed without the
creator's approval. Changes to an illustrator's work must be made by the illustrator, unless permission is secured
from the illustrator first. It constitutes creating a derivative work from copyrighted material, which, intentionally
or not, violates federal law and places the buyer at risk. Many are simply not aware of this law and unintentionally
violate it, so please be aware.
It is important to work with professional integrity. Dealing respectfully with another member of
the graphic arts profession goes far in ensuring a more stable business environment for practitioners and clients
alike. It also supports one of the oldest and most basic tenets of our profession: the autonomy and freedom necessary
to create our own professional independence. Respect for the rights of illustrators is a matter of practice, ethics
and law. It is the value of the intellectual property of a colleagueand within the body of the intended user that
is ultimately at stake in many of these concerns. To deal honorably with illustrators is to recognize the value of
a colleague's work, to respect the practice of another creative professional and to uphold the integrity of the design
profession. Illustrators invest substantially in the research and development of their technique and style. This, in
turn, is the basis of their business and reputation. To ask an illustrator to mimic the style of another illustrator
is not considered ethical or, in some instances, even legal. There is a difference between finding illustrators who
are influenced or inspired by other artists versus talent who directly infringe on copyrighted material. (In recent
years, a number of illustrators have won copyright infringement lawsuits based on theft of an illustrator's intellectual
property.) Illustrations should not be used without gaining permission from the creator. Accessing and using illustrations
from print, portfolios, the Internet or other materials whether for mock-ups, comps or final designswithout first
securing permission and establishing a basis for use rights is illegal and the most common law broken by clients, whether
knowingly or unknowingly. (Refer to the 1976 Copyright Act for more details.) Make sure you are acquiring illustration
from an accountable and respectable source. For many within the illustration community, royalty-free illustration is
considered a questionable practice. Royalty-free distributors do not generally license work from creators and do not
always compensate creators adequately (or at all) for giving up rights to their work. Many collections have been gathered
through unwilling and/or unknowing sources over the years and simply do not compensate the talent that created them.
In other instances, royalty-free work is often produced by artists who have inadequate concern for the integrity of how
the work is used, or who have no bargaining power to defend their rights in a competitive marketplace.
In addition, much of this work is imitative, since the creative professional is being asked to create and sell images
without sustained accountability, and some of the work may cross the line of plagiarism. Although there are appropriate
sources and uses of royalty-free work, it is the exception and otherwise may have some risk associated with its use. When
there is no accountability for the history of usage, you are lowering the value of the design. Illustration is a value-added
commodity, while royalty-free and stock serve a more decorative function. If you take an illustration out of its intended
use and use it to simply fill space, you have lessened the value of the final product. An illustrator can serve as a creative
consultant. The possibility of unbound creativity in an unexplored multimedia graphic age is endless. It is commonly known
that imagery is the newest commodity in the current economy. Who better to recognize quality and develop the potential of
this commodity than the creators of the imagery? Illustrators are being retained as creative consultants for virtually every
stage of conceptual work. At one time, art directors developed sketches of their ideas and hired artists to execute their
ideas. Today, illustrators often assume the role as consultants to art directors and clients in developing the concepts for
communicating content, as well as executing the ideas. This involvement of an illustrator from concept to execution on a
project takes full advantage of an artist's creativity and experience in integrating illustration into the intended outcomes.
Additional roles include, but are not limited to, animator, storyboard artist, production designer, logo designer, character
developer, illustrative journalist, Internet artist and mock-up/comp artist, among many others.
Copyright American Institute of Graphic Arts, 2001. Used with Permission.
|
